stolowe01
stolowe01
Photography \ Nature | 06/17/07 @545 |
yvy |
critiques (42) |
views (1077)
Do not copy, modify, distribute or sell the whole or parts of the image above without permission of the creator. More.
Description
gloomy table mountains, poland. 350d, tokina 12-24, nd8, taken against the light.
Vote statisticsRecent: 0 votes, 0 pointsTotal: 46 votes, 390 points |
Cast your voteYou have to be logged in to voteVoting? Read the faq |
OptionsNone |
Comments (42)
Comment
To write a comment you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Reviews (0) beta
Write a review
To write a review you need to be logged in
If you're not a registered member, click here to sign up.Search the site
Found a rip-off? Report it!
Copyright © 2000-2008 All rights reserved
Read the Terms of use and Privacy Statement.
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .
Copyright © 2000-2008 All rights reserved
This site is a property of Brothers in art For more information and support, contact .


06/17/07 @609
I love the composition and the details.
cool colors
06/17/07 @635
John
06/17/07 @660
06/17/07 @729
06/17/07 @731
06/17/07 @735
I like the overcast sky
Top Marks
06/17/07 @754
Poohblah: you are right, i was really upset that i had to crop the sides off. the reason was crap cokin holder, which was unstable on my lenses committing horrible vignette. CRY DOT COM
06/17/07 @767
06/17/07 @847
06/17/07 @853
06/17/07 @856
Excellent photo!
06/18/07 @152
top marks!
06/18/07 @400
06/18/07 @476
You mentioned the holder for the filter was clipping the frame, tip, put the holder back into your bag and hold the filter in front of the lens with your hand, and in the case of the images above, I would have held the filter at an angle so it only covered the sky and not the land area itself..
Hope this helps, but for me this is the failing in the image above.. Wrong use of Filter..
06/18/07 @507
but Almost-Human, i have to disagree with you totally. the photo might not be perfect but the reasons are different than those you mentioned. the problem with the dark land here is because i took this photo against the light. it is obvious then that the land will come out dark or black even. even nd grad can't prevent that (unless you want the sky to be overexposed). i pulled the exposure up in ps. plus the filter was angled the way you mentioned.
the thing is that the holder for cokin z-pro simply sucks. i think it's made of crap material (plastic) and "clicking on the lense" doesn't really make the whole construction stable. i had to crop the sides off because the holder moved on my lense. what's more, my bf almost lost it on the cliff cuz it got detached itself. i think it's ridiculous they call this series pro, if it can't just stay still on the lense.
about taking the filter with my hand: yeah it might be a good idea if i'm sure i can stand still with it. but i was on the cliff with a fence of questionable safety and 20 kids running around and against me. besides, what is this holder for anyway than for saving you from holding it with your hand. i guess we'll just get lee system which appears to be much more stable.
well, thanks for the opinion tho.
06/18/07 @618
As for the pro series.. well in my experience the pro series is in fact just larger filter sizes, but you mentioned the Z pro, not sure what that is, either way I have about 50 + cokin filters and they are excellent and I never use the holder.
With regard to the ND8 filter, for anyone wondering what this is its a nutral density Filter, its job is to hold back light from getting to the lens, not to be confused with a graduated Gray filter, the difference between the two is simple, they both darken the image but the ND does it without changing colours, the Gray Grad simply makes things gray and that includes clouds.
Now you said you held it at an angle.. but in the image above the rock on the top right looks dark, did you clip this rock with the grad? I am assuming it is a ND grad ?
Hope this helps and I never knew you had 20 kids
06/18/07 @649
06/18/07 @776
Carlos
06/18/07 @904
and yeah surely it's nd8 grad, as i mentioned in description. now look at the scenery again, the rock on the right is dark because it's in a deep shadow, since the light is from the back and also the trees and bushes around add to it. you can also notice the same shadow in the bottom right corner and that couldn't obviously be a filter ;p one more thing: with this kind of sky the light is pretty uneven; you have those very bright areas and those deep shadowed ones. that's not too easy environment. i was actually lucky that there was some sunlight on that big rock at all.
sidenote: luckily i didn't make those 20 kids, it was just another group of hundreds which followed us on the trail and made making photos very arduous .
Carlos: you're right, i was just too careful with not changing too much
06/19/07 @004
06/19/07 @423
06/19/07 @538
06/19/07 @601
06/19/07 @858
Wonder if also having another grad filter probably ND2 grad held vertically to make the dark to bright cloud transition even would have helped.. !!! Agree with Carlos too !!
Like the composition for ability to capture depth !! Well done !!
06/20/07 @237
06/20/07 @356
06/20/07 @356
Great stuff, agree with moserArtist, moody
06/21/07 @472
06/21/07 @828
06/21/07 @898
06/22/07 @240
06/22/07 @348
06/22/07 @440
06/22/07 @896
06/23/07 @969
Btw., try a smart sharpening technique on this one, the sharpening method you've used seems to be somewhat rough on the details.
Good timing on the shot, it's nicely composed too, although Pooblah does have a good point.
06/23/07 @683
06/23/07 @867
top marks!
06/24/07 @060
07/17/07 @873
08/06/07 @857
09/28/07 @994
11/04/07 @398